flexiblefullpage - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
Currently Reading

Agreement Reached on Formaldehyde Rule

Advertisement
billboard -
Legal & Human Resources

Agreement Reached on Formaldehyde Rule

It's going to affect a lot of your materials 


By By Kaitlin Schuler May 18, 2018
This article first appeared in the May 2018 issue of Pro Remodeler.

Bringing years of battles to a close, in March, a California court approved new guidelines regarding formaldehyde emissions in composite wood. 

The requirements were part of an agreement between the Environmental Protection Agency, the Sierra Club, and industry trade associations (including the National Association of Home Builders). 

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California set three requirements: composite wood product manufacturers must comply with the rule by June 1, 2018; products manufactured between December 2017 and June 2018 can be sold; and products that comply with California’s formaldehyde rule will be considered compliant with the EPA’s rule until March 2019.

The Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products final rule was issued in 2016 to establish formaldehyde emission standards as well as product testing and tracking requirements for composite wood products, following a fallout with formaldehyde-filled products sold by Lumber Liquidators (ultimately costing the company $36 million in class action lawsuits).

The rule set an original compliance date of December 2017, which was later pushed back to December 2018 due to the transition between presidential administrations. The Sierra Club filed a lawsuit arguing that the extension was too long, while industry trade associations countered that shortening the extension would make it difficult for remodelers to provide accurate production schedules or meet agreed-upon deadlines and pricing contracts.

Though remodelers and builders are not forced to comply with the rule (as they don’t manufacture the products used at jobsites), their suppliers are, and an earlier compliance date has the potential to disrupt the supply chain and increase prices. 

The June compliance date allows the opposing sides meet in the middle. And while the potential for supply chain disruption still exists, having a buffer of even a few months allows the industry time to prepare.

Related Stories

Are Your Text Messages Getting You Into Trouble?

Find out what happened when a contractor sent two advertising texts to the wrong homeowner

Why I Hired a Recruiter

Here’s how and why a remodeling business owner chose the recruiter route

5 Tips for Successful Performance Reviews

If you want to peek into a successful business, look inside the minds of its people

Homeowner Not Paying? 3 Options for Next Steps From a Lawyer

A construction lawyer outlines three options for settling a dispute over a non-paying client.

Grow Your Business Through Collaboration with Remodeling Peers

Remodeling Mastery Forums offers a unique business opportuniy for remodelers

Dreamstyle Awarded $7 Million in Lawsuit Against Renewal by Andersen

An arbitration panel awarded Dreamstyle Remodeling last week on the basis of wrongful contract termination.

5 Tips on Setting up a Collection System

Construction lawyer Thomas Croessmann walks contractors through 5 tips on setting up a system for collecting payments from clients.

4 Tips For Handling Bad Reviews

These suggestions from an attorney (who specializes in remodeling) may surprise you

What Rights Do Remodelers Have When Clients Refuse To Pay?

Collecting funds from a client who refuses to pay is an all-to-common problem. Here are insights into some right...and (very) wrong ways to get that last payment.

The Murder of a Tile Contractor and the Cautionary Tale Behind It​

The mainstream media isn't always kind to contractors. But what about difficult homeowners? What about homeowners who are even worse than that?

Advertisement
boombox1 -
Advertisement
native1 -

More in Category




Advertisement
native2 -
Advertisement
halfpage1 -