Currently Reading

Agreement Reached on Formaldehyde Rule

Legal & Human Resources

Agreement Reached on Formaldehyde Rule

It's going to affect a lot of your materials 

By By Kaitlin Schuler May 18, 2018
This article first appeared in the May 2018 issue of Pro Remodeler.

Bringing years of battles to a close, in March, a California court approved new guidelines regarding formaldehyde emissions in composite wood. 

The requirements were part of an agreement between the Environmental Protection Agency, the Sierra Club, and industry trade associations (including the National Association of Home Builders). 

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California set three requirements: composite wood product manufacturers must comply with the rule by June 1, 2018; products manufactured between December 2017 and June 2018 can be sold; and products that comply with California’s formaldehyde rule will be considered compliant with the EPA’s rule until March 2019.

The Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products final rule was issued in 2016 to establish formaldehyde emission standards as well as product testing and tracking requirements for composite wood products, following a fallout with formaldehyde-filled products sold by Lumber Liquidators (ultimately costing the company $36 million in class action lawsuits).

The rule set an original compliance date of December 2017, which was later pushed back to December 2018 due to the transition between presidential administrations. The Sierra Club filed a lawsuit arguing that the extension was too long, while industry trade associations countered that shortening the extension would make it difficult for remodelers to provide accurate production schedules or meet agreed-upon deadlines and pricing contracts.

Though remodelers and builders are not forced to comply with the rule (as they don’t manufacture the products used at jobsites), their suppliers are, and an earlier compliance date has the potential to disrupt the supply chain and increase prices. 

The June compliance date allows the opposing sides meet in the middle. And while the potential for supply chain disruption still exists, having a buffer of even a few months allows the industry time to prepare.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Related Stories

Creating a Company Fire Drill: How to Prepare for the Worst

A disastrous fire could have been a lot worse if the business wasn’t prepared for the unexpected

Proposed Robotext Law Could Transform Home Improvement Lead Generation Industry

The Federal Communications Commission continues efforts to crack down on lead aggregators

The 5 Most Dangerous Practices for 2024

Common mistakes contractors must avoid to stay out of legal trouble

5 Dangerous Practices That Get Contractors Into Legal Trouble

On this episode of Rock Stars of Remodeling, home improvement attorney D.S. Berenson shares common practices contractors should avoid

3 Things to Add to Your Construction Contract—From a Lawyer

Did you know you can add these three elements to your contracts?

A Lawyer's Advice for Contracts, Cancellations, and More

How much should you charge for cancellation? Can you stop negative reviews? Construction lawyer Karalynn Cromeens answers

3 Reasons You Struggle with Hiring

Learn three ways to better position yourself for attracting new talent

Are Your Text Messages Getting You Into Trouble?

Find out what happened when a contractor sent two advertising texts to the wrong homeowner

Why I Hired a Recruiter

Here’s how and why a remodeling business owner chose the recruiter route

5 Tips for Successful Performance Reviews

If you want to peek into a successful business, look inside the minds of its people


More in Category