flexiblefullpage - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
Currently Reading

Report shows EPA underestimated costs tied to lead paint rule

Advertisement
billboard -
Codes & Standards

Report shows EPA underestimated costs tied to lead paint rule

The EPA's Inspector General recently reported on the findings of an investigation into the Lead: Renovation, Repair and Painting rule. Not surprisingly, that report determined that the EPA underestimated the rule’s cost and overestimated its benefits.


By National Association of Home Builders August 5, 2012
Report shows EPA underestimated costs tied to lead paint rule

On July 25, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Inspector General reported on the findings of an investigation into the agency's economic analysis of the Lead: Renovation, Repair and Painting (LRRP) rule. Not surprisingly, that report determined that the EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) underestimated the rule’s cost and overestimated its benefits.

Moreover, the EPA Inspector General found that the training manual and subsequent “certified renovator” training failed to clearly delineate which lead-safe work practices are mandated and which are simply recommendations.

The report recommends that OCSPP reexamine the costs and benefits of the rule to determine whether it should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed in accordance with the Obama Administration's directive to reform unnecessary and burdensome regulations. The inspector's report further recommends that the EPA revise its training manual to more clearly distinguish which work practices are mandatory.

Bristling at the Inspector General's findings, the OCSPP responded by asserting that it does not intend to review its economic analysis, and that it has already addressed issues related to training under the lead paint rule. Nevertheless, the report's findings — coupled with numerous complaints voiced by NAHB and others regarding the rule's lack of clarity, the absence of an approved test kit, and more — have put added pressure on the EPA to resolve the issues related to this poorly written and implemented rule.

Similarly, NAHB chairman Barry Rutenberg's recent congressional testimony on inefficient government regulations that are harming housing and the economic recovery focused, in part, on the lead paint rule and provided further impetus for lawmakers to push the EPA into making the necessary revisions.

For more information, visit www.nahb.org/leadpaint.

leaderboard2 - default

Related Stories

Gas Ban in New Construction Considered by Chicago

The mayor-backed ordinance would impact all new construction

NAHB Releases Remodeler Jobsite Safety Plan Outlines

NAHB recently released a remodelers safety & health program for small remodeling businesses

Heat Pumps Now Required in Washington New Construction

Washington is the second state to require heat pumps in an effort to electrify homes

What is a Deep Energy Retrofit?

Model ReModel 2022 will undergo a deep energy retrofit—here's how.

How To Cut and Install Stair Stringers

Part 2 on the basics of building a straight run of stairs

Breaking the Fall

Complying with OSHA’s safety rules requires planning, training and (most of all) supervision

Innovative Products: BILCO StakWEL

A modular system to streamline window well construction

Ready For Your Deck Inspection?

As safety concerns drive ever more stringent deck codes, remodelers and builders find ways to ensure projects pass inspection

Agreement Reached on Formaldehyde Rule

It's going to affect a lot of your materials 

Remodeler Fraud: Robbing Peter to Pay Paul

The line between doing business and committing fraud is thinner than you think 

Advertisement
boombox2 -
Advertisement
halfpage2 -
Advertisement
native1 -

More in Category




Advertisement
native2 -
Advertisement
halfpage1 -
Advertisement
leaderboard1 -